Clinton News /clinton Clinton News Wed, 11 Jan 2017 07:02:55 +0000 en-US hourly 1 In just 10 days, the radical left will attempt to overthrow the U.S. government… Here’s why they will fail /clinton/2017-01-11-radical-left-attempt-overthrow-u-s-government-communist-uprising-revolution-coup-inauguration.html /clinton/2017-01-11-radical-left-attempt-overthrow-u-s-government-communist-uprising-revolution-coup-inauguration.html#respond Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 According to multiple sources that have reached out to me — including an individual who has infiltrated left-wing “revolutionary” groups in California — the radical left has convinced itself it has a significant chance of pulling off some variation of an uprising / occupy / revolution / coup operation on Inauguration Day (January 20).

It’s supposed to start as “protests,” then morph into “riots,” then crescendo in a kind of “mad rush” to occupy federal buildings and then somehow declare some left-wing commie nut job to be the “legitimate” President of the United States. Another source told me during a recent interview that some elements of the radical left are even planning on setting off bombs to maximize chaos, occupy emergency responders and even send some federal officers home in body bags. (Weather Underground style, get it?)

Mentally ill leftists — a term that now seems increasingly redundant — are even fantasizing over an Inauguration Day “purge” inspired by the low-budget Hollywood film The Purge. The film proposes that for one day a year, every act is legal and can be carried out without consequence, including murder, rape, looting, arson and assault. A recent installment of the film series called The Purge: Election Day is serving as a template for violent leftards who are so detached from reality, they actually believe January 20 is a “Purge” day where a person can commit any violence they want.

I’m here to tell you that, in my analysis, they are going to fail miserably. It doesn’t mean they won’t harm or even kill some people along the way, but they won’t succeed in overthrowing the government or stopping the swearing in of President Trump. Why? Because there will be roughly 10,000 total “troops” on the scene that day, encompassing roughly 1,000 U.S. Marines, 5,000 National Guard troops, 3,000 federal officers and at least 1,000+ D.C. police officers. (My estimate of 10,000 is quite conservative. Realistically, it’s probably more like 15,000 in all, including thousands of undercover agents from various law enforcement departments and agencies, both state and federal, including the FBI, US Secret Service, Treasury Dept., DHS, etc.)

Communist uprisings don’t work when the rest of the citizenry is armed

The massive mistake the deranged left is making in all this is failing to remember that in nearly every successful communist uprising in the history of the world, the communists had most of the guns. But America’s radical leftist are afraid of guns. And the real firepower, it turns out, is in the hands of the military, the feds, the police officers and all the millions of pro-Second Amendment citizens who are ready and willing to do their part to defend the Republic if necessary.

To explain all this — including the hilarity of the deranged left — I’ve recorded a 40 minute podcast that covers my full analysis, what my sources have told me is going to happen, why the uprising will fail and why I believe 1,000 U.S. Marines all on their own could easily defeat 100,000 zombie leftards bull rushing the Capitol building.

This podcast is a bit tongue-in-cheek because I can’t stop laughing at the mental derangement and psychological fragility of the left, so don’t take every word of this podcast seriously. But it does give you my overall take on why I think January 20, 2017 will be a day of defeat for the desperate, deranged left.

Click here for the full podcast at Health Ranger Report.

Or listen here:

Or watch the YouTube video here:


/clinton/2017-01-11-radical-left-attempt-overthrow-u-s-government-communist-uprising-revolution-coup-inauguration.html/feed 0
FBI quietly releases 300 pages of Hillary Clinton investigation records /clinton/2017-01-09-fbi-quietly-releases-300-pages-of-hillary-clinton-investigation-records.html /clinton/2017-01-09-fbi-quietly-releases-300-pages-of-hillary-clinton-investigation-records.html#respond Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 The FBI quietly released nearly 300 pages of records from its investigation of Hillary Clinton’s private email server on Sunday night.

Article by Chuck Ross

This is the fifth release of Clinton investigation records from the FBI. The documents deal with the handling of computer hardware collected from Clinton’s lawyers for the investigation and also contain emails from FBI officials discussing the classification of Clinton’s emails.

The FBI has previously released notes from interviews it conducted during its investigation of Clinton’s handling of classified information. FBI director James Comey declined to recommend that Clinton be charged in the case, and Attorney General Loretta Lynch accepted that advice.

The emails included in the documents are from the months prior to the formal opening of the Clinton email probe, which occurred on July 10, 2015. The exchanges show disagreements between the FBI and State Department over whether some of Clinton’s personal emails should be classified.

In one April 27, 2015 email, an FBI official wrote to other officials that they were “about to get drug into an issue on classification” of Clinton’s emails. The official, whose name is redacted, said that the State Department was “forum shopping,” or seeking a favorable opinion on the classification issue by asking different officials to rate emails as unclassified.

Other email traffic sheds light on a controversy involving State Department under secretary for management Patrick Kennedy and a request he made in 2015 that the FBI reduce its classification of a Clinton email related to the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks in Benghazi.

Clinton investigation notes released by the FBI in October showed that an FBI official said during an interview as part of the email probe that Kennedy asked him and others at the FBI to relax classifications on some emails. (RELATED: State Dept. Official Wanted Clinton Email Reclassified Because It ‘Caused Problems’)

The new FBI release contains a May 21, 2015 email in which Michael Steinbach, the FBI’s assistant director of the counterterrorism division, detailed a conversation he had with Kennedy about the classification issue.

Steinbach said that the FBI had determined that one of Clinton’s emails should be classified using b(1) and b(7) redactions, used to protect information in the interest of national defense and to prevent the disclosure of a confidential source, respectively. Kennedy asked Steinbach to classify the email using only the b(1) category.

An email sent two days earlier from a separate FBI official provided more information about the dispute.

The official, whose name is redacted, wrote that the Clinton email was redacted and classified on the rationale that it contained information that would cause “interference with foreign relations.”

The FBI official wrote that the email could disclose sources and investigative methods used by the bureau.

“While the email does not name the particular official, this might be deduced and, given the threat of violence in the region, any surmise could be fatal for whoever cooperated with us,” the official wrote.

“State will say no one will know if it is redacted, but that is not how classification works,” they added.

The official wrote that he informed Kennedy of that rationale and that Kennedy said he would be in contact with Steinbach.

The FBI release also includes an email from the attorney of Bryan Pagliano, the Hillary Clinton State Department aide who set up and managed her secret email server. In the email, Mark MacDougall, Pagliano’s lawyer, informed the FBI that Pagliano would decline the bureau’s request for an investigation. Pagliano would eventually meet with the FBI in December, but only after receiving limited immunity from the Department of Justice.


Read more at:

/clinton/2017-01-09-fbi-quietly-releases-300-pages-of-hillary-clinton-investigation-records.html/feed 0
ARS Technica: White House fails to make case that Russian hacking tampered with election /clinton/2017-01-07-ars-technica-white-house-fails-to-make-case-that-russian-hacking-tampered-with-election.html /clinton/2017-01-07-ars-technica-white-house-fails-to-make-case-that-russian-hacking-tampered-with-election.html#respond Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 Dan Goodin of Ars Technica writes that the DHS-FBI report on Russian hacking in 2016 “provides almost no new evidence to support the Obama Administration’s claims Russia attempted to interfere with the US electoral process.”

(Article by Breitbart News, republished from

From Ars Technica:

Talk about disappointments. The US government’s much-anticipated analysis of Russian-sponsored hacking operations provides almost none of the promised evidence linking them to breaches that the Obama administration claims were orchestrated in an attempt to interfere with the 2016 presidential election.

The 13-page report, which was jointly published Thursday by the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI, billed itself as an indictment of sorts that would finally lay out the intelligence community’s case that Russian government operatives carried out hacks on the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and Clinton Campaign Chief John Podesta and leaked much of the resulting material. While security companies in the private sector have said for months the hacking campaign was the work of people working for the Russian government, anonymous people tied to the leaks have claimed they are lone wolves. Many independent security experts said there was little way to know the true origins of the attacks.

Sadly, the JAR, as the Joint Analysis Report is called, does little to end the debate. Instead of providing smoking guns that the Russian government was behind specific hacks, it largely restates previous private-sector claims without providing any support for their validity. Even worse, it provides an effective bait and switch by promising newly declassified intelligence into Russian hackers’ “tradecraft and techniques” and instead delivering generic methods carried out by just about all state-sponsored hacking groups.

Read more at:

/clinton/2017-01-07-ars-technica-white-house-fails-to-make-case-that-russian-hacking-tampered-with-election.html/feed 0
Tour de FARCE: US Intel report on Russian “interference” a hilarious parade of paranoia politics… zero evidence… just rehashed delusional conspiracy theories /clinton/2017-01-06-tour-de-farce-us-intel-report-on-russian-interference-a-hilarious-parade-of-paranoia-politics-rehashed-delusional-conspiracy-theories.html /clinton/2017-01-06-tour-de-farce-us-intel-report-on-russian-interference-a-hilarious-parade-of-paranoia-politics-rehashed-delusional-conspiracy-theories.html#respond Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 We really have reached the point where everything that’s run by the political left has devolved into a parade of delusional paranoia. Whether it’s man-made “climate change,” the purely imagined “KKK hate crimes” epidemic, or the hilarious delusional conspiracy theory about Russians “hacking the election,” everything the left has come up with in recent memory is rooted in sheer fiction (if not slobbering mental illness).

The latest laughable attempt at creating a Russian boogeyman to scare all the little leftist snowflake children has arrived in the form of a US intel report released Friday. Titled, “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections,” the report is so laughably devoid of a single shred of credible evidence that actual journalists all across the world are rolling on the floor with hysterical laughter.

“Every time IC repackages its same assertions in a new form, media acts like it’s been proven, even though it – again – includes no evidence,” Tweeted one of the few remaining independent journalists on the planet, Glenn Greenwald.

In another tweet, Greenwald followed up with, “It’s shocking how much this report was hyped and how literally no effort was made to include *any* evidence at all.”

In response, left-wing trolls on Twitter accused Greenwald himself of “working for the Russians.” (That’s now the excuse the everything the left doesn’t like. Must be the Russians!)

A circle jerk of rehashed left-wing paranoia

In essence, a tiny number of Obama puppets inside the CIA and FBI just “made s##t up” and then tried to pass it off as legitimate intelligence. The laughably hysterical document — widely and blindly repeated everywhere in the obedient but mindless left-wing media — is nothing more than a circle jerk rehash of delusional conspiracy theories.

Notably, there isn’t a single piece of actual evidence found in the entire report.

The report spends much of its time covering RT, a media organization funded by the Kremlin: “RT’s coverage of Secretary Clinton throughout the US presidential campaign was consistently negative and focused on her leaked e-mails and accused her of corruption, poor physical and mental health, and ties to Islamic extremism,” says the report.

In other words, anyone who was critical of Hillary Clinton was obviously working with the Russians, right? Never mind that she was an unlikable, deeply corrupt, criminal-minded mob boss with an obvious neurological disorder who pre-sold the White House to foreign interests.

Opponents of fracking are also working for the Russians, you see

It gets even better. The report also implies that environmentalists and opponents of fracking are working for the Russians, too. (Yes, I know. It’s just beyond hilarious.)

“RT runs anti-fracking programming, highlighting environmental issues and the impacts on public health.”

Noooooo! Say it isn’t so! You mean to tell me that people who are concerned about the environmental impact of fracking are really working for the Russians? For the record, that’s about 90% of all leftists, by the way. Apparently, not only are all the people on the right working for the Russians (because they hate Hillary), but also all the people on the left are working for the Russians, too (because they hate fracking).

According to the CIA, then, everyone is working for the Russians. Except, not Hillary Clinton, we’re told, even though she was the U.S. Secretary of State who approved the Russian takeover of U.S. strategic uranium mines… a convenient fact the lying left-wing media refuses to report.

A Tour de Farce of intelligence bullsh#ttery

If you can stop laughing, consider the fact that the left-wing media takes this bogus intelligence report as “fact” even though it is completely devoid of any evidence. The entire thing is nothing more than Obama sycophants ginning up scary bedtime stories to tell each other, then labeling it all “intelligence.”

In truth, there’s no intelligence to be found in the report at all. It’s so devoid of facts, evidence and sources — but rife with opinions, conclusions and “analysis” of opinions — that the whole thing should probably be renamed Tour de Farce: The CIA’s Drug-Induced Assessment of Make-Believe Threats to the Kingdom of F##ktardia.

In conclusion, the report wildly discredits the CIA, FBI and NSA with its cringe-worthy (and obviously politically biased) “analysis” that reads more like twisted, drug-induced paranoid delusions than meaningful intelligence. The very first thing President Trump should do after being sworn in, obviously, is to drain the swamp at the CIA and remove every single analyst churning out this paranoid hogwash.

/clinton/2017-01-06-tour-de-farce-us-intel-report-on-russian-interference-a-hilarious-parade-of-paranoia-politics-rehashed-delusional-conspiracy-theories.html/feed 0
Former Clinton Foundation CEO missing since October 2016 – #WheresEric internet chatter reaches a fevered pitch /clinton/2017-01-05-former-clinton-foundation-ceo-missing-since-october-2016-whereseric-internet-chatter-reaches-a-fevered-pitch.html /clinton/2017-01-05-former-clinton-foundation-ceo-missing-since-october-2016-whereseric-internet-chatter-reaches-a-fevered-pitch.html#respond Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 Former Clinton Foundation CEO, Eric Braverman, was hired in July 2013, supposedly backed by Chelsea Clinton to “impose McKinsey-like management rigor,” to the foundation. The foundation board approved a $395,000 salary, plus bonuses, then voted to extend his term through 2017. Weeks after that vote to extend his board term, Braverman abruptly quit in January 2015.

(Article by Sudan Duclos, republished from

According to a Politico article about Braverman from March 2015, “his exit stemmed partly from a power struggle inside the foundation between and among the coterie of Clinton loyalists who have surrounded the former president for decades and who helped start and run the foundation.”

Six days after that Politico story was published and about two months after Braverman resigned, Joe Scarborough, host of Morning Joe on MSNBC, tweeted “A source close to the Clintons tell @ron_fournier to “follow the money” and find the real HRC scandal.”

According to leaked emails published by Wikileaks from the Podesta emails, Center for American Progress President Neera Tanden emailed Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta “@JoeNBC: A source close to the Clintons tell @ron_fournier to “follow the money” and find the real HRC scandal. – I’m hoping someone is keeping tabs on Doug Band. Quote in here is from someone who worked in Clinton Foundation.”

Podesta responded with one name “Eric Braverman.” To which Tanden replied “Holy Moses.”

That same month is when the news of Clinton’s private email server broke nationally, became major headline news.

Wikileaks published those emails during the height of the election season, in October 2016, around the same time that Eric Braverman disappeared from public view. His last public activity can be traced to an October 12, 2016 retweet. A look at his Twitter history shows he was wasn’t very active, as the one before that was on August 3rd and before that, one in June.

Is it a coincidence that Braverman cannot be contacted in any manner, from emails sent to him and to Yale University, where he is still listed for Spring 2017 classes in the School of Management and the law school, all not responded to?

Rachel Alexander from Stream, writes the following: “I left a voicemail on Braverman’s personal phone and sent him an email, but received no response. He is still listed as a lecturer at Yale University and, contrary to some reports, there is a record of his lectures going back several years. I contacted the press office and Braverman’s department at Yale and received no response.”

ANP has also attempted to reach out to Braverman as well as contacts connected to him, to no avail.

Videographer George Webb, who runs a popular YouTube channel has been tracking Braverman’s disappearance, providing daily feature video updates, and believes Braverman officially went missing 12 days after his last tweet, on October 24, 2016, which was just two days after Wikileaks published the Podesta email where it became public knowledge that Podesta suspected Braverman of being behind the “follow the money and find the real HRC scandal,” scoop given to Ron Fournier.”

Internet chatter and conspiracy theories have surrounded Braverman’s disappearance from the public, originating with a rumor that he had sought asylum from Russia, but due to his intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton Foundation, in conjunction with the fact that five FBI bureaus across the country, in New York, Little Rock, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles and Miami , are all involved in a massive probe of the Clinton Foundation, it is more likely that Braverman is in protective custody as witness to the crimes he uncovered during his tenure at the Clinton Foundation, since no official missing persons report has been filed on him.

In November 2016, Brett Bauer from Fox News reporters that FBI sources believed the Clinton Foundation case was moving towards “likely an indictment.”

Transcript via Real Clear Politics:

BRET BAIER: Breaking news tonight — two separate sources with intimate knowledge of the FBI investigations into the Clinton emails and the Clinton Foundation tell Fox the following:

The investigation looking into possible pay-for-play interaction between Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Foundation has been going on for more than a year. Led by the white collar crime division, public corruption branch of the criminal investigative division of the FBI.

The Clinton Foundation investigation is a, quote, “very high priority.” Agents have interviewed and reinterviewed multiple people about the Foundation case, and even before the WikiLeaks dumps, agents say they have collected a great deal of evidence. Pressed on that, one sources said, quote, “a lot of it,” and “there is an avalanche of new information coming every day.”

Some of it from WikiLeaks, some of it from new emails. The agents are actively and aggressively pursuing this case. They will be going back to interview the same people again, some for the third time.

As a result of the limited immunity deals to top aides, including Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson, the Justice Department had tentatively agreed that the FBI would destroy those laptops after a narrow review. We are told definitively that has not happened. Those devices are currently in the FBI field office here in Washington, D.C. and are being exploited.

The source points out that any immunity deal is null and void if any subject lied at any point in the investigation.


Another interesting point that we would remiss to ignore is how it became public knowledge that immunity deals had been offered to Clinton aides, regarding the investigations, not one peep from the FBI, nor the mainstream media, has mentioned any such “deal” for Braverman, a man who held the CEO position for the Foundation for over a year, and would be far more knowledgeable about any crimes committed by the Clinton Foundation.

#WheresEric has now been created as a hashtag on Twitter and depending on whether we go from the October 12 retweet by Braverman or the videographer’s date of October 24th, he has now been missing anywhere from 70 to 82 days.


It all comes back to the “follow the money to find the real HRC scandal,” because the private server use, the internal corruption and collusion by the DNC and the Clinton campaign, and the mainstream media, makes for good headlines, but when you follow the money, all roads lead back to the Clinton Foundation, under investigations by multiple FBI bureaus, and the man that has been missing for well over two months was in a position to know all of their dirty secrets.

Since the initial questions about Braverman’s disappearance from the public eye started months ago, all it would take is one public statement, one returned email, one video, for Braverman to dispel all theories, rumors and talk of his disappearance, yet not one word has come from him or anyone that knows him. No public statements saying he is alive and well. ….. nothing.

The silence is deafening, and troublesome.


Read more at:

/clinton/2017-01-05-former-clinton-foundation-ceo-missing-since-october-2016-whereseric-internet-chatter-reaches-a-fevered-pitch.html/feed 0
Clinton Colluding Reporters Now Set to Cover Trump Administration /clinton/2017-01-03-clinton-colluding-reporters-now-set-to-cover-trump-administration.html /clinton/2017-01-03-clinton-colluding-reporters-now-set-to-cover-trump-administration.html#respond Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 A number of reporters exposed by Wikileaks to have colluded with the Hillary Clinton campaign will go on to cover the Trump White House.

Article by Ben Kew

CNBC chief political correspondent John Harwood regularly emailed Hillary Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, congratulating him on Hillary’s successes and boasting about how he provoked Donald Trump at a Republican primary debate which he moderated.

He also gave Podesta advice on his perceived threat of Dr. Ben Carson, and asked the Clinton campaign for advice on how he should interview Jeb Bush.

As CNBC chief political correspondent, Harwood can shape the coverage of one of America’s key television networks as the Trump administration prepares to take power.

Another prominent reporter on the Trump White House will be the recently hired New York Times chief political reporter Glenn Thrush, who sent copies of his stories to John Podesta for review.

In an email exchange, Thrush asked Podesta “not to tell anyone I did this” as he sent a copy of his story. Podesta replied, “no problems here.”

Other journalists with leading roles reporting on the Trump administration include New York Times chief national correspondent Mark Leibovich, who was described in a Clinton media strategy plan as “sympathetic” to the campaign.

Leibovich also took orders from the Clinton campaign on which parts of an interview with Hillary Clinton could be used for publication.

Although Clinton’s candidacy received support from practically the entire mainstream media, not all were found to have actively colluded with her campaign.

However, Clinton strategist Joel Benenson did invite a range of top journalists to a private cocktail party, in a list that included ABC anchor George Stephanopoulos, CNN’s Gloria Borger and NBC’s Savannah Guthrie.

Read more at:

/clinton/2017-01-03-clinton-colluding-reporters-now-set-to-cover-trump-administration.html/feed 0
Leftist “tolerance” on display as unhinged liberals call for genocide against whites and attacks on conservative “cripples” /clinton/2016-12-26-leftist-tolerance-on-display-unhinged-genocide-against-whites-attacks-on-cripples.html /clinton/2016-12-26-leftist-tolerance-on-display-unhinged-genocide-against-whites-attacks-on-cripples.html#respond Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 As the unhinged political left continues to unravel into what can only be called sociopathic mental illness, I thought it might be educational to bring you four recent, shocking episodes of left-wing “tolerance” on display.

As you review these, remember that “tolerance” of the left is selectively applied only to those who agree with every important political narrative of liberalism. Anyone who disagrees with the false narratives of the left is targeted for extreme hatred, death threats and now even a call to be exterminated via actual genocide.

This is what happens when the party of “love wins” loses the election: They turn to hatred, violence and deeply rooted desired to literally kill everyone who doesn’t agree with them.

Example #1: Left-wing hate monger attacks Texas Governor Greg Abbot for being a “cripple”


A Twitter user attacked Texas Governor Greg Abbott for his religious faith and asked him why God has never helped him walk again.

Abbott has been confined to a wheelchair since July 1984 when a tree fell on him, breaking his back. He was running with a law school friend at the time through a neighborhood in Houston.

The Twitter user, @dschlick, tweeted out “Hey @GregAbbott_TX, since you’re so holy and close to God, when is he going to make you walk again? #crippledgreg #charlatanabbott.”

For the record, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott is far more of a courageous man and visionary leader than Obama or any left-winger could ever hope to be. There’s simply no comparison. Gov. Abbott is a man I would be honored to call “President” one day.

Example #2: Left-wing Drexel University professor calls for genocide against whites


A professor at Philadelphia’s Drexel University has a heartwarming Christmas message: Associate Professor of Politics and Global Studies George Ciccariello-Maher is wishing for a “white genocide.”

Taking to his Twitter account on Christmas eve, Ciccariello-Maher, himself a white man, tweeted, “All I Want for Christmas is White Genocide” … The professor who describes himself as a “visiting researcher” at El Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales in Mexico also had praise for the “massacre of whites.”

The professor’s Twitter feed is filled with hateful, obnoxious messages, anti-Americanism, slams of President Donald Trump, attacks on Jews, as well as pro-Black Lives Matter and pro-communist sloganeering.

Yes, this is the “love” and “compassion” from the left, demonstrating the “tolerance” for all humankind that we’re told is exclusive to liberals.

Gosh, achieving “diversity” is almost instantaneous if all whites are exterminated in a new left-wing Holocaust, isn’t it? Good thing we have the Second Amendment, I would argue, so that we can defend ourselves against violent left-wing whackos when they try to commit genocide against innocent women and children who happen to be Caucasian.

Example #3: Extreme harassment of a female college student by Clinton supporters causes her to drop out


A freshman student [Andi Moritz] at Bryn Mawr College has dropped out after what she says was unbearable harassment from her fellow students for supporting President-elect Donald Trump.

Moritz told the English House Gazette, a Bryn Mawr student blog, that a low point came when she was approached by a peer mentor in her dorm, who instead of offering support began to vilify her. The peer mentor said Moritz had “personally attacked” other students by expressing support for Trump.

Moritz told the response was so hostile she ended up calling a suicide hotline for support. Later, she visited a campus counselor, who she says wasn’t very helpful.

So, according to college student snowflakes, merely supporting Donald Trump is a “personal attack” on the entire student body. Yes, this is how insane and mentally ill the left-wing colleges and universities have become in America. To them, genocide against whites is “good” but supporting a Republican is “an attack” against everyone.

Example #4: Ivanka Trump stalked, harassed on commercial flight by insanely angry left-wing nut job


Ivanka, who was with her husband Jared Kushner and three children, was harassed by a male passenger who told her that “Your father is ruining the country,” before declaring that “She should be flying private.”

As the man continued his tirade, he was removed from the flight and could be heard screaming, “You’re kicking me off for expressing my opinion,” as he was taken by security.

The husband of the passenger, Matt Lasner, later took to Twitter to recount the event, where he boasted how his husband was “chasing them down to harass them.”

To summarize the left’s “tolerance,” if you agree with genocide, verbal assaults and extreme threats against “cripples,” then you are “tolerant” (and even progressive)

So now we really get down to the root of liberalism, which is best described at this point as a mental disorder. The most fervent advocates of liberalism are violent, unstable nut jobs, conspiracy theorists and whackos who fake hate crimes against themselves with shocking frequency (nearly every “hate crime” reported by the Huffington Post, MSNBC or CNN later turns out to be a false flag hoax committed by leftists against themselves).

The mass psychosis of the unhinged left stems from the deep linguistic programming of the hypnotic left-wing media which has literally programmed left-wingers into near-Manchurian candidates to be “activated” at any moment against conservatives. To top it all off, left-wing whackos are now convinced that the KKK is everywhere, Russians “hacked” the election, genocide against whites is “diversity,” and chopping up living human babies for organ harvesting is “women’s health.”

The extreme violence, delusional narratives and unbridled hatred now being demonstrated by those on the left isn’t merely amusing; it’s dangerous to society.

Hillary Clinton’s FEMA Fun Camps now have a whole new use under President Trump

I sense we are rapidly approaching the day where We the People are going to have to quite literally institutionalize many of these left-wing nut jobs and subject them to some sort of deprogramming therapy in the hopes of being able to allow them to eventually return to society with their mental faculties restored. Some of them have become so unhinged and completely out of touch with reality that they can no longer function in society without posing a very real threat to the people around them.

Perhaps after January 20, President Trump can help American heal by calling for a nationwide treatment program for delusional, paranoid leftists who have been put into a state of mental derangement by CNN, the NYT, WashPost, MSNBC and left-wing hate spewing political grunts like Michael Moore. A mere 30-day time out from the left-wing media might allow a large number of its victims to finally come to their senses and wake up from their hypnosis programming.

Good thing we already have Hillary Clinton’s “fun camps” built and ready to be put to good use, eh? Now we finally know their greater purpose: Serving as de-hypnosis centers for mentally ill leftists who can no longer function in a democratic society.

/clinton/2016-12-26-leftist-tolerance-on-display-unhinged-genocide-against-whites-attacks-on-cripples.html/feed 0
FBI can’t agree with politicized CIA’s faulty intelligence /clinton/2016-12-22-fbi-cant-agree-with-politicized-cias-faulty-intelligence.html /clinton/2016-12-22-fbi-cant-agree-with-politicized-cias-faulty-intelligence.html#respond Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 It’s becoming a game of “he said, they said,” between the FBI and the CIA over what President-elect Donald J. Trump has called a highly-politicized (and bogus) claim that Russia interfered in the presidential election to sway the results in his favor.

In recent days, the echo chamber “mainstream media” has been pushing the narrative that there is a “consensus” among CIA analysts that Moscow hacked the Democratic National Committee and the campaign of Hillary Clinton only, with the goal of helping Trump to win the election. This nonsensical and unexplained narrative is not supported by a whit of evidence, mind you, and is all based on the premise of undermining Trump’s legitimacy by, among other things, interfering with the final tally of the Electoral College, whose electors voted Dec. 19. (One thing missing here, by the way, is CIA Director John Brennan’s ringing endorsement of this “consensus.”)

Now, the FBI has waded into this fabricated “controversy,” and frankly, the bureau isn’t buying it.

As The Daily Caller noted, a senior FBI official who met with Republican and Democratic members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence did not concur with the CIA’s assessment, “frustrating Democrats.”

That Democrats were “frustrated” tells you all you need to know here, but we digress.

While the CIA believes that Moscow “quite” clearly wanted Trump to win, it is a very bold claim, and again, one that is not substantiated by any real evidence – one of the main reasons the FBI isn’t going along with the spy agency’s assessment. In fact, as Newsweek reported, veteran CIA operatives are warning the agency not to jump to conclusions because there is no substance to the claim.

But none of that matters. Nor does it matter that, had Clinton won and it was Trump who was challenging the victory, trying to mess with the outcome of the Electoral College and blaming his loss on Russian hacking, he would have been lambasted, shamed and called a conspiracy nut.

No one answering the most basic question here

The lamestream press has jumped on the bandwagon en masse, and so are some members of Congress. One – a congressman from Connecticut, Democratic Rep. Jim Himes – took to begging the Electoral College to vote instead for Clinton, the most security-compromised, criminally investigated presidential nominee in U.S. history.

All of this was meant to effect a “soft coup,”effectively denying Trump the presidency or, at the very least, denying him legitimacy.

That the FBI has stepped up and said it doesn’t agree with a small cadre of politically motivated CIA agents’ assessment that Moscow interfered is a good thing. Trump needs all the help he can get if he’s going to make good on clearing the D.C. swamp.

And for the record, the CIA and the lamestream media have failed to answer the most important – and basic – question in all of this: Why help Trump when Clinton is so compromised that Vladimir Putin would be writing U.S. foreign policy towards Russia?


/clinton/2016-12-22-fbi-cant-agree-with-politicized-cias-faulty-intelligence.html/feed 0
Democrat donors just paid $3.5 million to help Trump gain 131 votes in Wisconsin’s official recount /clinton/2016-12-22-democrat-donors-just-paid-3-5-million-to-help-trump-gain-131-votes-in-wisconsins-official-recount.html /clinton/2016-12-22-democrat-donors-just-paid-3-5-million-to-help-trump-gain-131-votes-in-wisconsins-official-recount.html#respond Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 President-elect Donald J. Trump owes Democratic donors a word of thanks, because they helped him extend his popular vote lead in Wisconsin over his vanquished presidential opponent, Hillary Clinton, who has now lost twice in her bid for the Oval Office.

As reported by the Wisconsin State Journal newspaper, the Jill Stein-led recount of votes in the state netted Trump another 131 votes, extending his lead over Clinton and further solidifying that state’s Electoral College votes for his victory.

Stein, however, gained too: Another 66 votes.

The paper reported further that in all, there was a net change of 1,769 addition votes that were counted, or about 0.06 percent of the more than 2.9 million that were cast. The last statewide recount in a 2011 state Supreme Court contest netted an extra 1,233 votes from 1.5 million ballots.

In all, Trump gained an extra 837 votes while Clinton gained 706 votes. Trump was victorious in Wisconsin—the first Republican candidate to do so since the late 1980s—by 22,308 votes.

“Completing this recount was a challenge, but the real winners are the voters,” said Mark Thomsen, chairman of the Wisconsin Election Commission, in a statement. “Based on the recount, they can have confidence in Wisconsin’s election results accurately reflect the will of the people, regardless of whether they are counted by hand or by machine.”

The WEC had originally told county clerks to ensure their recounts were complete by 8 p.m. Dec. 12, so that the results could be certified the following day—the last day federal law guarantees a state’s electoral votes will reflect the popular vote when the Electoral College convenes Dec. 19.

Democrats only accept election results when they win

The recount of nearly 3 million votes was launched Dec. 1 after Stein, with the Green Party, paid the estimated $3.5 million cost to have it performed. The actual cost won’t be known for a few more weeks, according to commission spokesman Reid Magney. She will be responsible for paying any additional costs over that amount if they are incurred; she will be refunded any amount under the $3.5 million mark.

News of the increased vote count in Wisconsin for Trump comes as a judge halted a planned recount effort in Pennsylvania, with the latter state also affirming its vote tally for the billionaire businessman.

U.S. District Judge Paul S. Diamond said he rejected the Stein-led recount effort in Pennsylvania on at least six grounds, The Associated Press reported. The recount effort was being opposed by Trump, the Pennsylvania Republican Party and the state attorney general’s office.

“Most importantly, there is no credible evidence that any ‘hack’ occurred, and compelling evidence that Pennsylvania’s voting system was not in any way compromised,” Diamond wrote.

So there you have it: Trump owes some gratitude to Stein for helping him extend his lead over her and Clinton.

Democrats and Leftists have no problem accepting elections when they win. They just don’t like to do it when they don’t.


/clinton/2016-12-22-democrat-donors-just-paid-3-5-million-to-help-trump-gain-131-votes-in-wisconsins-official-recount.html/feed 0
If Democrats ran the Olympics, losers would all get gold medals, and winners would be accused of working for the Russians /clinton/2016-12-22-if-democrats-ran-the-olympics-losers-would-all-get-gold-medals-and-winners-would-be-accused-of-working-for-the-russians.html /clinton/2016-12-22-if-democrats-ran-the-olympics-losers-would-all-get-gold-medals-and-winners-would-be-accused-of-working-for-the-russians.html#respond Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 During an appearance recently on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace, President-elect Donald J. Trump was having none of the phony Democratic/media narrative that the Russians hacked the election in favor of him and to the detriment of his opponent, now two-time presidential loser Hillary Clinton.

“I think it’s ridiculous,” Trump told the host. “I think it’s just another excuse. I don’t believe it. I don’t know why and I think it’s just – you know, they talked about all sorts of things.”

Trump went on to note that he won several competitive battleground states by large margins to arrive at an electoral count of 306 (270 are needed to win the presidency outright) to Clinton’s paltry 232. He also pointed out correctly that there is no “consensus” among the intelligence community on this, and even the heads of the intelligence community are not buying into it, despite what one agency – the CIA – has said (without coming right out and saying it has evidence to prove its case).

Finally, Trump also pointed out that all nations with the capability to do so hack or attempt to hack into U.S. government and political systems. “They have no idea if it’s Russia or China or somebody,” he said. “It could be somebody sitting in a bed some place. I mean, they have no idea.”

He is spot-on; “they” don’t. And neither does the Democratic Party’s propaganda division, the much-maligned and wholly discredited “mainstream” media, which – by the way – has also reported that nobody knows for sure if Russia did hack its way into influencing the election for Trump.

The fact is, this is the Democratic Party imploding – trying to create a false narrative to a) explain away their butt-kicking at the polls, and b) to delegitimize the Trump presidency early and often.

But what do we expect from a party which advocates for “participation trophies” so as to deny children the opportunity to learn how to lose with dignity (because most of us lose more in life than we win)? This is the party that would hand out gold medals to losers at the Olympics just to make everyone “feel good,” while claiming that any athlete who actually won is just a Russian propaganda stooge.

It really has come down to this for the beaten, battered and rejected Democratic Party – but its leaders and members are too arrogant and too smug to believe it is their policies America doesn’t like, along with the candidate they nominated (in an underhanded way at that). Clinton was, without question, the most legitimately controversial presidential candidate in the country’s history. Convicted or not, she has been investigated more times by government law enforcement agencies than anyone before her. And, in the process, she created more divisiveness during her 30-plus years of “public service” and controversy (all of the various “-gates” during her time as first lady, coupled with the scandalous behavior of her family’s foundation) than anything Trump has produced.

But it’s only going to get worse. No matter how out-of-touch and irrelevant the Democrats and their lock-step media become, they’ll still be screaming the same thing for years: The Russians did it!

Here is the full Trump interview:


/clinton/2016-12-22-if-democrats-ran-the-olympics-losers-would-all-get-gold-medals-and-winners-would-be-accused-of-working-for-the-russians.html/feed 0